"Randy.Dunlap" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, John Levon wrote:
>
> | On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 10:32:08AM -0700, george anzinger wrote:
> |
> | > The 4th, 5th, and 6th parts are support code and not really
> | > part of the kernel.
> |
> | So ...
> |
> | > This part contains man pages for the new system calls.
> |
> | ... why are they here ?
> |
> | http://freshmeat.net/projects/man-pages/
>
> I agree, please let's not clutter the kernel tree.
Oh, I agree also. I don't think any of the high-res-timers
support patches belong in the tree. For testing and
verifying the system calls, however, it is nice to have
them. It is easy to do the patch and then move the whole
directory as this is the only thing in it.
I might suggest, however, that we should have a regression
test set for the kernel "somewhere". Does such a thing
exist? I haven't seen it, but then I have yet to see a
great number of things ;)
-- George Anzinger george@mvista.com High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:00:48 EST