Re: 2.5.39 kmem_cache bug

From: John Levon (levon@movementarian.org)
Date: Sun Sep 29 2002 - 08:53:07 EST

Next message: Krzysztof Halasa: "Re: System very unstable"
Previous message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: 2.5.39 kmem_cache bug"
In reply to: Ed Tomlinson: "Re: 2.5.39 kmem_cache bug"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 09:15:52AM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:

> How about this (untested) instead. If we can avoid using cachep->slabs_free its
> a good thing. Why use three lists when two can do the job? I use a loop to clean
> the partial list since its possible that for some caches we may want to have more
> than one slabp of buffer.

This patch seems to work for me too (though I have tested it only
lightly)

At least it fixes the false kmem_cache_destroy() report vs. 2.5.39

regards
john

-- 
"When your name is Winner, that's it. You don't need a nickname."
	- Loser Lane
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Krzysztof Halasa: "Re: System very unstable"
Previous message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: 2.5.39 kmem_cache bug"
In reply to: Ed Tomlinson: "Re: 2.5.39 kmem_cache bug"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:00:40 EST