On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 03:51:48PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > leave the capable in and say it's enough or you add your random hook
> > and remove that one. Just adding more and more hooks without thinking
> > gets us exactly nowhere except to an unmaintainable codebase.
>
> capable is needed to be checked, as we are not modifying the existing
> permission logic.
I odn't think it makes sense to have two security checks that both
end up in the LSM code after each other..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:00:32 EST