On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> writes *unless* you are creating an ISO image on your disk. In my opinion
> it is much more important to optimize for the more common, concurrent
> read case, than it is for the sequential write case with intermittent
> reads.
You're missing the point. The only reason the reads are
intermittent is that the application can't proceed until
the read is done and the read is being starved by writes.
If the read was serviced immediately, the next read could
get scheduled quickly and they wouldn't be intermittant.
Rik
-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:00:31 EST