Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.38-mm3 with contest 0.37

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Fri Sep 27 2002 - 09:41:04 EST

Next message: Venkatesh Rao: "Re: Problems with tcp_retransmit_skb - Please omit the previous incomplete mail"
Previous message: will fitzgerald: "what do these 9 network functions actually do?"
In reply to: Con Kolivas: "[BENCHMARK] 2.5.38-mm3 with contest 0.37"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Sep 26 2002, Con Kolivas wrote:
> io_load:
> Kernel Time CPU Ratio
> 2.4.19 170.06 45% 2.36
> 2.5.38 283.27 28% 3.92
> 2.5.38-mm2 106 75% 1.47*
> 2.5.38-mm3 95.9 84% 1.33*

this is encouraging to see, 2.5.38-mm3 has the new deadline io scheduler
and it appears to be performing well here too. I'm especially looking
forward to 2.5.38 vs 2.5.39 too, as 2.5.39 will have some deadline
updates that are not in -mm3.

-- Jens Axboe

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Venkatesh Rao: "Re: Problems with tcp_retransmit_skb - Please omit the previous incomplete mail"
Previous message: will fitzgerald: "what do these 9 network functions actually do?"
In reply to: Con Kolivas: "[BENCHMARK] 2.5.38-mm3 with contest 0.37"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:00:31 EST