Re: UP IO-APIC

From: Miquel van Smoorenburg (miquels@cistron.nl)
Date: Tue Sep 24 2002 - 13:01:10 EST

Next message: Martin Schwidefsky: "[PATCH] 2.5.38 s390 fixes: 06_xpram."
Previous message: Martin Schwidefsky: "[PATCH] 2.5.38 s390 fixes: 11_preempt."
In reply to: Ricky Beam: "Re: UP IO-APIC"
Next in thread: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: UP IO-APIC"
Reply: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: UP IO-APIC"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <Pine.GSO.4.33.0209241119500.11624-100000@sweetums.bluetronic.net>,
Ricky Beam <jfbeam@bluetronic.net> wrote:
>The local
>APIC makes perfect sense albeit rare. Single processor IO APICs are very
>rare and are usually MP systems with only one processor.

I think most AMD Athlon boards have an IO APIC

Mike.

-- Computers are useless, they only give answers. --Pablo Picasso

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin Schwidefsky: "[PATCH] 2.5.38 s390 fixes: 06_xpram."
Previous message: Martin Schwidefsky: "[PATCH] 2.5.38 s390 fixes: 11_preempt."
In reply to: Ricky Beam: "Re: UP IO-APIC"
Next in thread: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: UP IO-APIC"
Reply: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: UP IO-APIC"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:00:19 EST