RE: 2.5.34-mm4

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Sun Sep 15 2002 - 12:54:27 EST

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] IRQ patch for Toshiba Char Driver in 2.5.34"
Previous message: M. Edward Borasky: "RE: 2.5.34-mm4"
In reply to: M. Edward Borasky: "RE: 2.5.34-mm4"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.5.34-mm4"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.5.34-mm4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, M. Edward Borasky wrote:

> Borasky's Corollary 1: If you *can* measure it and it *does* exist, the
> cheapest solution may still be to buy more memory, more disks or a
> faster processor.

Current 2.5 is sluggish on systems with a fast CPU and 768 MB
of RAM, whereas current -ac runs the same workload smoothly
with 128 MB of RAM.

Now tell me, what's your point ?

Rik

-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] IRQ patch for Toshiba Char Driver in 2.5.34"
Previous message: M. Edward Borasky: "RE: 2.5.34-mm4"
In reply to: M. Edward Borasky: "RE: 2.5.34-mm4"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.5.34-mm4"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.5.34-mm4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:38 EST