Re: [patch] dump_stack(): arch-neutral stack trace

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Date: Sat Sep 14 2002 - 23:51:47 EST


Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 10 September 2002 03:01, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > From Christoph Hellwig, also present in 2.4.
> >
> > Create an arch-independent `dump_stack()' function. So we don't need to do
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> > show_stack(0); /* No prototype in scope! */
> > #endif
> >
> > any more.
> >
> > The whole dump_stack() implementation is delegated to the architecture.
> > If it doesn't provide one, there is a default do-nothing library
> > function.
>
> Is there a reason for not calling it "backtrace()" ?

In retrospect, no. But it's called dump_stack() in 2.4 now.

-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:37 EST