Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Sat Sep 14 2002 - 10:11:32 EST

Next message: rwhron@earthlink.net: "irman takes 50x longer without O(1) on uniprocessor"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

> > The question is: why is the VM not able to fulfill such a simple need in
> > a clean way?
>
> No. The question is: "why does swsuspend need to stick its fingers
> into every other subsystem of the kernel, instead of trying to
> remain vaguely modular ?"

I'm not trying to stick swsusp fingers anywhere. It was suggested to
me to hack VM and I'm trying to avoid that.
Pavel

-- 
Casualities in World Trade Center: ~3k dead inside the building,
cryptography in U.S.A. and free speech in Czech Republic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: rwhron@earthlink.net: "irman takes 50x longer without O(1) on uniprocessor"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:36 EST