Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Fri Sep 13 2002 - 17:42:57 EST

Next message: Timothy D. Witham: "RE: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited"
Previous message: Timothy D. Witham: "RE: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited"
In reply to: Xavier Bestel: "Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?"
Next in thread: Xavier Bestel: "Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?"
Reply: Xavier Bestel: "Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 13 Sep 2002, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Le ven 13/09/2002 à 23:33, Rik van Riel a écrit :
>
> > I suspect only very few people will use swsuspend, so it should
> > not be intrusive.
>
> I don't think so.

You think many people will use it, or you think swsuspend
should be intrusive and have code in all other kernel
subsystems ? ;)

Rik

-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Timothy D. Witham: "RE: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited"
Previous message: Timothy D. Witham: "RE: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited"
In reply to: Xavier Bestel: "Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?"
Next in thread: Xavier Bestel: "Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?"
Reply: Xavier Bestel: "Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:35 EST