Re: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited

From: Giuliano Pochini (pochini@shiny.it)
Date: Fri Sep 13 2002 - 08:02:21 EST


> This is hard to setup, and has the some weaknesses:
> 1. You worry only about apps you _know_. But the guy who got
> his netscape or make -j killed will rename his
> copies of these apps to something else so your carefully
> set up oom killer won't know what is running.
> (How much memory is the "mybrowser" app supposed to use?)
> Or he'll get another software package that you haven't heard of.
>
> 2. Lots and lots of people running netscapes using
> only 70M each will still be too much. Think of
> a university with xterms and then they all
> goes to cnn.com or something for the latest news
> about some large event.
>
> Even nice well-behaved apps
> is bad when there is unusually many of them. [...]

That's obvious. The point is that the sysadmin should be
able to hint the oom killer as much as possible.
The current linux/mm/oom_kill.c:badness() takes into account
many factors. The sysadmin should be able to affect the
badness calculation on process/user/something basis.

Bye.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:33 EST