Which is why I pointed out that the issue at hand was not regarding the
everything else, but in fact the actual filesystem support.
As far as why the rest is still pending, I was just offering ideas.
A lot of this thread is advocacy as opposed to substantive conversation
about the how and/or why/why not of inclusion of XFS into mainline.
Fankly, there is no /real/ answer except "Linus has not weighed in on
the current question".
I lost my ability to invest emotions in either side of huge kernel
debates when the devfs and lvm wars happened.
On 09/10, Mike Galbraith said something like:
> At 02:23 PM 9/10/2002 -0500, Shawn wrote:
> >I'm not sure what this is intended to communicate.
>
> (sigh)
> If "everything else" the XFS team has asked for has gone in, it seems
> unlikely that
> sponsorship is needed.
>
> -Mike
-- Shawn Leas core@enodev.comI went to the eye doctor and found out I needed glasses for reading. So, I got some flip-up contact lenses. -- Stephen Wright - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:25 EST