Hello!
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:26:40AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > BUG at kernel/sched.c open 10 Sep 2002
> > > What exactly is this?
> > Looks like this is my bugreport for BUG in kernel/sched.c:944 in the middle
> > of partition parsing output on boot.
> > Subject of email was
> > '2.5.34 BUG at kernel/sched.c:944 (partitions code related?)'
> > msgid: 20020910175639.A830@namesys.com
> very strange backtrace:
> >>EIP; c0115818 <schedule+18/4a0> <=====
> Trace; c01053a0 <default_idle+0/40>
I noticed it too.
> i've once seen the 2.5 IDE code doing a schedule_timeout() from an IRQ
> handler, but the above has to be something else. Could you hack sched.c to
> print out the exact preemption count? It could be a preempt-count
> underflow due to an unbalanced spin_unlock, or an inbalanced
> preempt_enable. [or the IRQ code - but i doubt that, we'd have seen
I have preemption disabled.
> problems much earlier if this was the case.]
> Oleg, do you have CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK enabled? That should catch an
> unbalanced spin_unlock().
Yes, I do.
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y
CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM=y
Bye,
Oleg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:24 EST