XFS needs a sponser. Who amung Linus's circle of trust cares to comment
or re-evaluate?
If no one, I guess it's a moot point.
On 09/09, Andi Kleen said something like:
> Thunder from the hill <thunder@lightweight.ods.org> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, khromy wrote:
> > > What's up with XFS in linux-2.5? I've seen some patches sent to the list
> > > but I havn't seen any replies from linus.. What needs to be done to
> > > finally merge it?
> >
> > It has been stated quite regularly that XFS
> > a) doesn't always work like it should yet
>
> That's quite bogus. While not being perfect XFS just works fine for lots
> of people in production and performs very well for a lot of tasks.
>
> > b) involves some changes which Linus doesn't like in particular, for
> > pretty good reasons.
>
> I think that's FUD too. That last patch had 6 lines or so of changes
> to generic code, everything else was already merged.
>
> I guess it just ended up in Linus' spam filters, like some other things...
>
> -Andi
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- Shawn Leas core@enodev.comI planted some bird seed. A bird came up. Now I don't know what to feed it. -- Stephen Wright - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:18 EST