Re: LMbench2.0 results

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Sun Sep 08 2002 - 03:25:26 EST


   From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
   Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 01:28:21 -0700
   
   But if this were truly the issue, the allocation and deallocation
   overhead for pagetables should show up as additional pressure
   against zone->lock.

The big gain is not only that allocation/free is cheap, also
page table entries tend to hit in cpu cache for even freshly
allocated page tables.

I think that is the bit that would show up in the mmap lmbench
test.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:14 EST