Re: 2.4.20-pre4-ac1 trashed my system

From: Mike Isely (isely@pobox.com)
Date: Thu Aug 29 2002 - 14:32:10 EST


On 29 Aug 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

>
> PIO LBA48 seems to work on all promise
> Early promise needs a helping hand with DMA LBA48, one promise doesnt
> seem to do DMA LBA48 on secondary at all, and newer stuff gets it right.
>
>
> And what controller/drives which you've provided.

Another detail: The drive was on the primary cable, configured as
master. It came up as /dev/hde (because hd[a-d] was for the
motherboard's "native" controller).

>
> If you can replicate it and find out where the problem begins that would
> be wonderful in itself.
>

I'll do what I can. I never have enough time. However I've benefitted
from this excellent OS for too long; I should be doing more in return.

  -Mike

                        | Mike Isely | PGP fingerprint
    POSITIVELY NO | | 03 54 43 4D 75 E5 CC 92
 UNSOLICITED JUNK MAIL! | isely @ pobox (dot) com | 71 16 01 E2 B5 F5 C1 E8
                        | (spam-foiling address) |

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 31 2002 - 22:00:27 EST