Re: Why it would be good to have AC interdiff patches

From: Axel Siebenwirth (axel@hh59.org)
Date: Thu Aug 29 2002 - 03:15:33 EST

Next message: Steffen Persvold: "Laptops with SpeedStep technology."
Previous message: Mikolaj J. Habryn: "[PATCH] 2.5.32 floppy init and misc fixes"
In reply to: Gregoire Favre: "Why it would be good to have AC interdiff patches"
Next in thread: Gregoire Favre: "Re: Why it would be good to have AC interdiff patches"
Reply: Gregoire Favre: "Re: Why it would be good to have AC interdiff patches"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Gregoire!

Gregoire Favre schrieb am Thursday, den 29. August 2002:

> 3) The time for compilation would be smaller as you modify less files.

Somebody wrote me one time that it is always a good thing to make an
"mrproper" after I have applied a patch to kernel sources.

Is that right?

Thank you,
Axel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Steffen Persvold: "Laptops with SpeedStep technology."
Previous message: Mikolaj J. Habryn: "[PATCH] 2.5.32 floppy init and misc fixes"
In reply to: Gregoire Favre: "Why it would be good to have AC interdiff patches"
Next in thread: Gregoire Favre: "Re: Why it would be good to have AC interdiff patches"
Reply: Gregoire Favre: "Re: Why it would be good to have AC interdiff patches"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 31 2002 - 22:00:26 EST