Hi,
On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, Thunder from the hill wrote:
> This is supposed to be a first step into a new direction where
> we no longer copy vendor kernels from the vendor CD to the system
> in the first position, but rather configure a new kernel for each
> system, hoping that somewhen the boxes will be fast enough to
> handle it in no time.
Let me be clear on this. I'm not for an "Aunt T*ll*e compiling a kernel",
but I'm rather thinking about following the comments on non-binary
distribution of programs. (Remember the talks when somebody suggested that
programs might be distributed more flexible if they're configured and
compiled on install?)
Thunder
-- --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .- --/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..- .- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.- --./.-/-.../.-./.././.-../.-.-.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 31 2002 - 22:00:14 EST