Re: Preempt note in the logs

From: Thunder from the hill (thunder@lightweight.ods.org)
Date: Sat Aug 24 2002 - 16:15:44 EST


Hi,

On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, Dag Nygren wrote:
> Anyway:
> - I am not running xfs, but I do run resiserfs.
> - I also have the ck2 patch that includes the low latency patch,
> could that be it?

So let's be clear on that:

2.4.19+preempt + reiserfs = charm
2.4.19+preempt + ck2 = possibly no problem, dunno
2.4.19+preempt + ck2 + reiserfs = bad dude

ck2 seems to introduce a problem that reiserfs triggers. It's not a
solution to say anything against reiserfs here, never fix the symptoms,
but the root cause...

Have a look at ck2 then...

                        Thunder

-- 
--./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .-
--/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-
.- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.-
--./.-/-.../.-./.././.-../.-.-.-

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 31 2002 - 22:00:14 EST