Re: aio-core why not using SuS? [Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29)]

From: Dan Kegel (dank@kegel.com)
Date: Thu Aug 15 2002 - 20:53:18 EST

Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] Eliminate root_dev_names - part 1 of 2"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: aio-core why not using SuS? [Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29)]"
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "aio-core why not using SuS? [Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29)]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> See the SuS API:
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/aio.h.html

There's a new release of the SuS, see

http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/aio.h.html

Harder to miss lio_listio() with the new one.
- Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] Eliminate root_dev_names - part 1 of 2"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: aio-core why not using SuS? [Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29)]"
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "aio-core why not using SuS? [Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29)]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:41 EST