Re: [patch] user-vm-unlock-2.5.31-A2

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Thu Aug 15 2002 - 18:45:03 EST


On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> personally i'd make it even more compact by merging the two clone flags as
> well, something along: CLONE_MANAGE_TID. I cannot see any reason for a
> thread library to use one of the bits only.

A thread library - maybe not. But the SETTID thing makes sense even for a
fork() user to avoid the fork/SIGCHLD race condition. In contrast, a
CLRTID does _not_ make sense in that situation, so I actually think they
are two separate issues (and should thus be two separate bits).

                Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:41 EST