Re: parport_serial / serial init order wrong?

From: Tim Waugh (twaugh@redhat.com)
Date: Wed Aug 14 2002 - 04:14:39 EST

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: Cache coherency and snooping"
Previous message: Marek Michalkiewicz: "Re: parport_serial / serial init order wrong?"
In reply to: Marek Michalkiewicz: "Re: parport_serial / serial init order wrong?"
Next in thread: Marek Michalkiewicz: "Re: parport_serial / serial init order wrong?"
Reply: Marek Michalkiewicz: "Re: parport_serial / serial init order wrong?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 11:11:52AM +0200, Marek Michalkiewicz wrote:

> How about making register_serial() initialize the serial driver by
> calling rs_init(), if it was not initialized yet? Works for me -
> see below. Do you see any problems with this?

What are the bad effects of having rs_init called twice during
boot-up?

Tim.
*/

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: Cache coherency and snooping"
Previous message: Marek Michalkiewicz: "Re: parport_serial / serial init order wrong?"
In reply to: Marek Michalkiewicz: "Re: parport_serial / serial init order wrong?"
Next in thread: Marek Michalkiewicz: "Re: parport_serial / serial init order wrong?"
Reply: Marek Michalkiewicz: "Re: parport_serial / serial init order wrong?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:36 EST