Re: [patch] clone_startup(), 2.5.31-A0

From: David Mosberger (davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com)
Date: Tue Aug 13 2002 - 15:52:19 EST


>>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:27:02 -0700, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> said:

>> I was, however, the flaws that you complained of had nothing to
>> do with the syscall -- it's all in the syscall wrapper (which is
>> required for clone(), like it or not.)

The issue is not whether a wrapper is needed or not.

My point is that it is cleaner to always describe stack areas as
memory areas (e.g., as a base/size pair). Note that this is
effectively what's happening in the platform-independent part of the
kernel today.

        --david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:34 EST