Re: [patch] tls-2.5.31-C3

From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Date: Mon Aug 12 2002 - 07:17:39 EST


On 12 Aug 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> That would get extremely messy when handing interrupts arriving while in
> an APM bios call (which is required on many laptops). I believe the 0x40
> = 0x40 assumption is identical across windows, buggy apm, buggy bios32,
> buggy edd, buggy .. (you get the picture)

ugh, we do Linux interrupts while in the APM BIOS?

in any case, it should be possible to create a 'minimal GDT' for the APM
BIOS [so that Linux interrupt handling is still possible] - to isolate it
from Linux as much as possible. But i agree that this gets messy ...

        Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:27 EST