Re: mmapping large files hits swap in 2.4?

From: Daniel Egger (degger@fhm.edu)
Date: Sat Aug 10 2002 - 17:19:59 EST


Am Sam, 2002-08-10 um 20.49 schrieb Mark Hahn:

> > It is just that it seems the mmaped region is not really bakked by
> > the underlying file but by swap space which was exactly what I
> > was trying to avoid by using a file.

> why do you think that?

Because the amount of free swap shrinks continously with mmaped memory
being touched. If I understood the concept of mmap correctly the system
should buffer read/writes to the mapped memory location with real RAM
and page out to the file.

My problem actually is that although I have enough memory to buffer the
whole area the kernel decides to hit hard on the disc which makes the
performance suck.

-- 
Servus,
       Daniel

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:22 EST