Re: [PATCH] 2.5.30 IDE 115

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Fri Aug 09 2002 - 08:48:39 EST

Next message: Michael Procter: "Re: Unix-domain sockets - abstract addresses"
Previous message: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: flushing arp buffer -- why __skb_dequeue rather than __skb_dequeue_tail"
In reply to: Marcin Dalecki: "[PATCH] 2.5.30 IDE 115"
Next in thread: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.30 IDE 115"
Reply: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.30 IDE 115"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Aug 09 2002, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> - Fix small typo introduced in 113, which prevented CD-ROMs from
> working altogether.

Have you fixed the sense reporting issue I told you about months ago?

> - Eliminate block_ioctl(). This code can't be shared in the way
> proposed by this file. We will port it to the proper
> blk_insert_request() soon. This will eliminate the _elv_add_request()
> "layering violation".

What are you talking about?

-- Jens Axboe

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael Procter: "Re: Unix-domain sockets - abstract addresses"
Previous message: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: flushing arp buffer -- why __skb_dequeue rather than __skb_dequeue_tail"
In reply to: Marcin Dalecki: "[PATCH] 2.5.30 IDE 115"
Next in thread: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.30 IDE 115"
Reply: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.30 IDE 115"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:19 EST