Re: further IO-APIC oddities

From: Martin J. Bligh (Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com)
Date: Thu Aug 08 2002 - 13:14:06 EST


> It's different from 2.5.29, I can follow up with that. 2.5.29 saw all 0's,
> so whatever it was that was scribbling over the MPC table and making the
> ID's all 0, it's scribbling on something else now (probably mem_map).

I thought that was only if you reduced NR_CPUS? And you shouldn't
need to read the IOAPIC tables to do that - the basic array was getting
overwritten. Or am I confusing at least two different bugs?

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:17 EST