sorry, i found it!
wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
but why do we need to wake up the sleepers again?
Thank you very much.
-Edward Shao-
----- Original Message -----
From: "Edward Shao (邵治國)" <szg90@cs.ccu.edu.tw>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 10:33 PM
Subject: a question about __down() in Linux/arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about __down() in kernel 2.4.18
> (Linux/arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c)
> I found the last line of __down() is
> wake_up(&sem->wait);
> but in kernel 2.5.28, i didn't see this line..
> is this line necessary in kernel 2.4.18?
> why?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Best Regard!!!
>
> -Edward Shao-
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:27 EST