RE: large page patch

From: Seth, Rohit (
Date: Thu Aug 01 2002 - 20:34:04 EST

There is typo in Andrew's mail. It is not 256K, but it is 256MB.

-----Original Message-----
From: David S. Miller []
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: large page patch

   From: Andrew Morton <>
   Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 18:26:40 -0700

   "David S. Miller" wrote:
> This is probably done to increase the likelyhood that 4MB page orders
> are available. If we collapse 4MB pages deeper, they are less likely
> to be broken up because smaller orders would be selected first.
   This is leakage from ia64, which supports up to 256k pages.

Ummm, 4MB > 256K and even with a 4K PAGE_SIZE MAX_ORDER coalesces
up to 4MB already :-)
   Apparently a page-table based representation could not be used by PPC.
The page-table is just an abstraction, there is no reason dummy
"large" ptes could not be used which are just ignored by the HW TLB
reload code.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:17 EST