I'd imagine that it would, JMHO, but it makes little sense, at least for
prime-time level maintenance of a kernel who's architecture, while valid
for use in many areas, is still far limited, even in light of 2.4.
The advancements which 2.6 will bring, over 2.4, will be extraordinarily
different, in terms of overall architecture it seems. Even if it's only
a 20% architecture difference from 2.4, think of how much further from
2.0 that is.
My $0.02.
On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 16:35, c0330 wrote:
> Hi everbody,
>
> Will kernel tree 2.0 stop developing and regard historical after the release
> of 2.6? I think we would put our focus on much more newer kernel. And I found
> this may confuse the newbies, because they don't know much about versioning in
> Kernel.
>
> In nowsdays, there are less less compputers using 2.0. We should push them to
> upgrade, so I think stop developing 2.0 is better, in my opinion
>
> ------
> 0330
> ------
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- Austin Gonyou <austin@digitalroadkill.net> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:26 EST