Re: What is the most stable kernel to date?

From: Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de)
Date: Sat Jul 13 2002 - 01:06:08 EST

Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: lazy_buddy-2.5.25-1"
Previous message: Erik Andersen: "Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5"
In reply to: Urban Widmark: "Re: What is the most stable kernel to date?"
Next in thread: Paul Larson: "Re: What is the most stable kernel to date?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Urban Widmark wrote:

> > Perhaps in your "normal use"...
> >
> > If you mount SMB shares Oopses appear quite frequently.
>
> 2.4.18 oopses if the share has characters that are not in your nls table.
> Patched and fixed for 2.4.19 (unless you are talking about some other oops?)

The Oopses I saw on my machine were fixed by
00-smbfs-2.4.18-codepage.patch. I saw an Oops by someone else that wasn't
fixed by this patch but it seems it was fixed by something else in
2.4.19-pre.

> /Urban

cu
Adrian

You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of time explaining its a free country because its a police state. Alan Cox

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: lazy_buddy-2.5.25-1"
Previous message: Erik Andersen: "Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5"
In reply to: Urban Widmark: "Re: What is the most stable kernel to date?"
Next in thread: Paul Larson: "Re: What is the most stable kernel to date?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:25 EST