On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:56:07PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > if 2.4/2.5 AFFS is in sync as you say (which iirc it is), then
> > I fail to see how you think the 2.5.25 disassembly is an old version.
> The last disassembled instruction is the PageUptodate() test, which was
> moved in later versions and can't be that early in the function for a
> recent version, but the disassembly is exactly what I would expect from
> an old affs version.
Hmm, interesting. Time to test the possibility of a ccache bug I think.
How old exactly out of curiosity ?
Dave
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:24 EST