Re: lilo/raid?

• Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 modifies the buffer_head struct?"
• Previous message: Oleg Drokin: "Re: [PATCH] Shift BKL into ->statfs()"
• In reply to: Helge Hafting: "Re: lilo/raid?"
• Next in thread: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: lilo/raid?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > What is the reason of using swap for cache buffers?????
>
> To be precise - swap is never used _for_ cache buffers - you'll
> never see file contents in the swap partition, perhaps with
> the exception of tmpfs stuff.
>
> But aggressive caching may indeed push other stuff into swap,
> typically little-used program memory.

ok.
tell me, then

When having an http-server-of-choice (tried several), I start downloading
10-50 files at 4Mbps. After some time, the server OOMs. The only processes
running are syslog, nfs daemons (idle) and the web server. This happens
without swap or with swap (1gig swap - fills up, and the server dies).

My last thread about it was "[BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again". After a rather
experimental patch my akpm, the problem was solved.

<snip>

roy

-- 
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester
Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 modifies the buffer_head struct?"
• Previous message: Oleg Drokin: "Re: [PATCH] Shift BKL into ->statfs()"
• In reply to: Helge Hafting: "Re: lilo/raid?"
• Next in thread: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: lilo/raid?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 07 2002 - 22:00:10 EST