Re: [announce] [patch] batch/idle priority scheduling, SCHED_BATCH

• Previous message: James Gale: "Re: System does not support PCI"
• In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "[announce] [patch] batch/idle priority scheduling, SCHED_BATCH"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 17:26, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> -#define SCHED_OTHER 0
> +#define SCHED_NORMAL 0

>From IEEE 1003.1-2001 / Open Group Base Spec. Issue 6:
"Conforming implementations shall include one scheduling policy
identified as SCHED_OTHER (which may execute identically with either the
FIFO or round robin scheduling policy)."

So, you probably want to add a "#define SCHED_OTHER SCHED_NORMAL" here
in order to prevent future confusion, especially because the user-space
headers have SCHED_OTHER, but no SCHED_NORMAL.

- Nicholas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Previous message: James Gale: "Re: System does not support PCI"
• In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "[announce] [patch] batch/idle priority scheduling, SCHED_BATCH"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 30 2002 - 22:00:15 EST