Re: [PATCH] SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR scheduler fix, kernel 2.4.18

From: Ingo Molnar (
Date: Thu Jun 13 2002 - 16:27:16 EST

On 13 Jun 2002, Robert Love wrote:

> You are entirely right, but Ingo's point is very valid: changing wakeup
> behavior is risky and is not ideal in the middle of 2.4.
> Fixing major bugs is fine for 2.4, but changing behavior to suit an
> ideal is not. Now is your chance to do so for 2.5, however.

i'd like to point out again that the current 2.5 scheduler has all the
functionality the patch adds for 2.4, so there's no argument about whether
it's correct technically.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 15 2002 - 22:00:29 EST