Re: CMD-649 support? (in a hurry - please help)

From: Samium Gromoff (_deepfire@mail.ru)
Date: Fri Jun 07 2002 - 07:43:42 EST

Next message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: Patch??: linux-2.5.20/fs/bio.c - ll_rw_kio could generate bio's bigger than queue could handle"
Previous message: Alessandro Suardi: "Re: 2.5.20 tulip bogosities"
Maybe in reply to: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "CMD-649 support? (in a hurry - please help)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > Yeah the Linux driver supports them, but CMD chips in general are
> > pretty buggy...

> oh. anyone around with any experience with the 649?
--
> Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester

i have one. 2.4.19-pre3, 1x IBM 60GXP - 1 month
or so of a stable usage.
also it runs faster on udma66 than on udma100, but thats beyond me... ;)
p166, 40M
         mwdma2 - 11 MB/s
         udma4 - 13.5 MB/s
         udma5 - 11.5 MB/s

--- cheers, Samium Gromoff

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: Patch??: linux-2.5.20/fs/bio.c - ll_rw_kio could generate bio's bigger than queue could handle"
Previous message: Alessandro Suardi: "Re: 2.5.20 tulip bogosities"
Maybe in reply to: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "CMD-649 support? (in a hurry - please help)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 07 2002 - 22:00:30 EST