Re: patent on O_ATOMICLOOKUP [Re: [PATCH] loopable tmpfs (2.4.17)]

• Next message: Larry McVoy: "business models [was patent stuff]"
• Previous message: J.A. Magallon: "Use of CONFIG_M686"
• In reply to: Adam J. Richter: "Re: patent on O_ATOMICLOOKUP [Re: [PATCH] loopable tmpfs (2.4.17)]"
• Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "business models [was patent stuff]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 22:52, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> If Red Hat is able to leave the licensing issues for their
> Linux patents unresolved and they still manage to be regarded as being

Nobody intends to leave in unresolved. It's simply a matter of coming up
on the Friday of a long weekend when most folk are not back until
Tuesday. I think everything will have been appropriately addressed
including the questions of the 'what if IBM/AOL/Sony/.. buy Red Hat' [1]
 kind

Alan
[1] Pick a bogus rumour, any rumour...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Larry McVoy: "business models [was patent stuff]"
• Previous message: J.A. Magallon: "Use of CONFIG_M686"
• In reply to: Adam J. Richter: "Re: patent on O_ATOMICLOOKUP [Re: [PATCH] loopable tmpfs (2.4.17)]"
• Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "business models [was patent stuff]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 31 2002 - 22:00:21 EST