Re: Memory management in Kernel 2.4.x

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon May 27 2002 - 17:50:31 EST


On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 22:33, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:22:22PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Well, if you can't fork a new process because that would push you into
> > overcommit, then you usually can't actually do anything useful on the
> > machine.
>
> Just use vfork or clone + exec. It's faster and uses less memory.

In the general case a fork doesn't cause too much overcommit. Most of
the binary is mapped read-only as is a lot of the library space. Since
its read only and backed by a file it has zero cost. If you mprotect it
then you pay at mprotect time

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 31 2002 - 22:00:21 EST