Re: Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines

From: J Sloan (jjs@lexus.com)
Date: Wed May 22 2002 - 17:14:00 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: AUDIT: copy_from_user is a deathtrap."
Previous message: Zlatko Calusic: "2.5.17 & ext3 & sard patches"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines"
Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alan Cox wrote:

>>Huh? RH 7.3 kernel has the O(1) scheduler merged?
>>
>>If the RH kernel is anything like the 2.4.19-pre8-ac5
>>I'm currently running, that is sweet indeed.
>>
>>
>
>rpm -q --changelog |grep "O(1)"
>
>
>
Yes, I was being lazy - but now that finals
are done with for now, I'll grab that kernel
source rpm and have a proper look at it.

Thanks,

Joe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: AUDIT: copy_from_user is a deathtrap."
Previous message: Zlatko Calusic: "2.5.17 & ext3 & sard patches"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines"
Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 23 2002 - 22:00:27 EST