On Wed, 22 May 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> > ... and while we are at flamewar-mongering, none of these files have any
> > business being in procfs.
>
> That depends on how you define procfs. Linux is not Plan 9. A lot of it
> certainly is going to cleaner with a devicefs and sysctlfs
OK, let me put it that way:
none of these files has any business bringing the rest of procfs along
for a ride and none of them has any reason to use any code from fs/proc/*.c
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 23 2002 - 22:00:25 EST