Re: /dev/port BUG and possible workaround

From: Martin Dalecki (dalecki@evision-ventures.com)
Date: Wed May 22 2002 - 02:52:35 EST


Uz.ytkownik Nick Kurshev napisa?:

...

> 800=inl(CFC)
> 2. Wrong log with using of /dev/port:

...

> But it seems that nobody uses this device. Then what is goal
> of implementing of this device?

Basically the goal is that contrary to some silly /proc
stuff which is "en vouge" nowadays you have the ability to
controll port access by using normal user permission control
semantics of unix file access permissions, by giving /dev/port
a proper group and so on. This is legacy crap of course, since
the above goal can be reached by using a apache-suexec alike wrapper
as well... even with more fine grained resolution of access controll.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 23 2002 - 22:00:24 EST