[patch 14/15] fix ext3 race with writeback

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@zip.com.au)
Date: Sun May 19 2002 - 14:45:35 EST


The ext3-no-steal patch has exposed a long-standing race in ext3. It
has been there all the time in 2.4, but never triggered until some
timing change in the ext3-no-steal patch exposed it. The race was not
present in 2.2 because 2.2's bdflush runs inside lock_kernel().

The problem is that when ext3 is shuffling a buffer between journalling
lists there is a small window where the buffer is marked BH_dirty.
Aonther CPU can grab it, mark it clean and write it out. Then ext3
puts the buffer onto a list of buffers which are expected to be dirty,
and gets confused later on when the buffer turns out to be clean.

The patch from Stephen records the expected dirtiness of the buffer in
a local variable, so BH_dirty is not transiently set while ext3
shuffles.

=====================================

--- 2.5.16/fs/jbd/transaction.c~sct-jbddirty Sun May 19 11:49:50 2002
+++ 2.5.16-akpm/fs/jbd/transaction.c Sun May 19 11:49:50 2002
@@ -1941,6 +1941,8 @@ void __journal_file_buffer(struct journa
                         transaction_t *transaction, int jlist)
 {
         struct journal_head **list = 0;
+ int was_dirty = 0;
+ struct buffer_head *bh = jh2bh(jh);
 
         assert_spin_locked(&journal_datalist_lock);
         
@@ -1951,13 +1953,24 @@ void __journal_file_buffer(struct journa
         J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction == transaction ||
                                 jh->b_transaction == 0);
 
- if (jh->b_transaction) {
- if (jh->b_jlist == jlist)
- return;
+ if (jh->b_transaction && jh->b_jlist == jlist)
+ return;
+
+ /* The following list of buffer states needs to be consistent
+ * with __jbd_unexpected_dirty_buffer()'s handling of dirty
+ * state. */
+
+ if (jlist == BJ_Metadata || jlist == BJ_Reserved ||
+ jlist == BJ_Shadow || jlist == BJ_Forget) {
+ if (test_clear_buffer_dirty(bh) ||
+ test_clear_buffer_jbddirty(bh))
+ was_dirty = 1;
+ }
+
+ if (jh->b_transaction)
                 __journal_unfile_buffer(jh);
- } else {
+ else
                 jh->b_transaction = transaction;
- }
 
         switch (jlist) {
         case BJ_None:
@@ -1994,12 +2007,8 @@ void __journal_file_buffer(struct journa
         __blist_add_buffer(list, jh);
         jh->b_jlist = jlist;
 
- if (jlist == BJ_Metadata || jlist == BJ_Reserved ||
- jlist == BJ_Shadow || jlist == BJ_Forget) {
- if (test_clear_buffer_dirty(jh2bh(jh))) {
- set_bit(BH_JBDDirty, &jh2bh(jh)->b_state);
- }
- }
+ if (was_dirty)
+ set_buffer_jbddirty(bh);
 }
 
 void journal_file_buffer(struct journal_head *jh,
--- 2.5.16/include/linux/jbd.h~sct-jbddirty Sun May 19 11:49:50 2002
+++ 2.5.16-akpm/include/linux/jbd.h Sun May 19 11:50:46 2002
@@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ enum jbd_state_bits {
 
 BUFFER_FNS(JBD, jbd)
 BUFFER_FNS(JBDDirty, jbddirty)
+TAS_BUFFER_FNS(JBDDirty, jbddirty)
 
 static inline struct buffer_head *jh2bh(struct journal_head *jh)
 {

-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 23 2002 - 22:00:17 EST