Re: Thoughts on using fs/jbd from drivers/md

From: Stephen C. Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Date: Sat May 18 2002 - 07:47:50 EST


Hi,

On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 06:35:37PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 07:34:10PM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> > Degraded mode relies on the parity disk being in sync at all times ---
>
> Doesn't degraded mode imply that there are not any parity
> disk(raid4)/stripe(raid5) updates?

Nope, partity updates still occur. It's more expensive than in
non-degraded mode, but parity still gets updated. If it wasn't, you
would not be able to write to a degraded array at all, as updating
parity is the only way that you can write to a block which maps to a
failed disk. By using parity, we only ever fail requests if there are
two or more failed disks in the array.

Cheers,
 Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 23 2002 - 22:00:16 EST