>> > <nico@cam.org>
>> > o [ARM 1110/1: fixes to the ARM checksum code
>> Not quite perfect yet, but I'm not too bothered - that used to be
>> [ARM PATCH]
>Now if only we knew which of the scripts Linus used. :)
>
>Matthias, is this regexp broken in the recent version of the
>script too?
I guess it still is "$_ =~ s/\[?PATCH\]?\s*//i;", which means
that it still is broken. There certainly are several solutions,
what do people think of "s/\[?[^\]]*PATCH\]?\W*//i;" ?
(Maybe a ^ at the beginning?)
Marcus
-- Marcus Alanen maalanen@abo.fi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 23 2002 - 22:00:16 EST