On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 03:14:10AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> you're right if we need a make clean it's because the buildsystem is
> broken. However one thing that happens all the time to me, is that I
> change an header like mm.h or sched.h and ~everything needs to be
> rebuilt then.
Yep. Our includes dependancies suck bigtime. Some work has been
done already in untangling the mess, but a lot more needs to be
done to really make a real difference.
Whats scary is that if you look at the dependancy graphs[1] of the
'best of the worst' includes, it's the same ugly mess we've
come to know and expect, and yet this is *after* some cleanups
already happened.
The 'dump everything into sched.h and friends' things really
needs splitting up some more, but it's a lot of work, and I don't
think kbuild2.5 alone is going to make that much difference
in this regard. Pulling out the component parts of the bigger
includes is probably the only way around this.
A driver that needs 'jiffies' defined should not be
inadvertantly pulling in a hundred include files.
Dave.
[1] ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davej/misc/graphs/
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 23 2002 - 22:00:15 EST