Re: Has anyone integrated the e1000 driver into the 2.4.x kernel

From: J.A. Magallon (jamagallon@able.es)
Date: Tue May 07 2002 - 16:58:59 EST

Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.14 IDE 56"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: pfn-Functionset out of order for sparc64 in current Bk tree?"
In reply to: Thomas Schenk: "Has anyone integrated the e1000 driver into the 2.4.x kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2002.05.07 Thomas Schenk wrote:
>I am working a project where I need to be able to compile the Intel
>e1000 driver into a monolithic kernel, but the readme says that you can
>only use the driver as a module. Is there some technical reason why
>this driver cannot be compiled into the kernel instead of being used as
>a module?
>

Backported from 2.5:

http://giga.cps.unizar.es/~magallon/linux/kernel/intel/

Apply both or you will get some rejects...

-- 
J.A. Magallon                           #  Let the source be with you...        
mailto:jamagallon@able.es
Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586
Linux werewolf 2.4.19-pre8-jam1 #1 SMP mar may 7 22:23:30 CEST 2002 i686
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.14 IDE 56"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: pfn-Functionset out of order for sparc64 in current Bk tree?"
In reply to: Thomas Schenk: "Has anyone integrated the e1000 driver into the 2.4.x kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:31 EST