Re: [uml-devel] Re: UML is now self-hosting!

• Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Memory Barrier Definitions"
• Previous message: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: pfn-Functionset out of order for sparc64 in current Bk tree?"
• In reply to: Lars Marowsky-Bree: "Re: [uml-devel] Re: UML is now self-hosting!"
• Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: UML is now self-hosting!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tuesday 07 May 2002 12:26 pm, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:

> > This machine thinks it's a normal SMP box, so scheduling happens as
> > normal
>
> Ugh ugh ugh. Too many page faults; you need a scheduler capable of keeping
> node affinity.

O(1)?

Thought it did. Might have to teach the load balancer to be a bit more
clever...

Rob
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Memory Barrier Definitions"
• Previous message: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: pfn-Functionset out of order for sparc64 in current Bk tree?"
• In reply to: Lars Marowsky-Bree: "Re: [uml-devel] Re: UML is now self-hosting!"
• Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: UML is now self-hosting!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:31 EST