Re: Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?)

From: Andy Carlson (naclos@andyc.dyndns.org)
Date: Mon May 06 2002 - 11:08:27 EST


On Mon, 6 May 2002, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:

> Perhaps it's about time to talk about pulling Tux into the main kernel
> tree, as khttpd once again has proved ususable.
>

Do the userspace tools still depend on Redhat or a derivative? If this
is true, I would say that Tux should stay out of the kernel. It is
aggravating when you want to try something new, and run into
dependencies on specific distros.

-- 
Andy Carlson                                    |\      _,,,---,,_
naclos@swbell.net                         ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_
Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html  |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'
St. Louis, Missouri                           '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:27 EST