Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Maybe this is a good place to try out a hash table variant of
> config_nonlinear. It's got to be more efficient than searching all the
> nodes, don't you think?
Most of the time there are only a few nodes, I just don't know where and
how big they are, so I don't think a hash based approach will be a lot
faster. When I'm going to change this, I'd rather try the dynamic table
approach.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:14 EST