Re: 2.5.11 + framebuffer compile patch -- OOPS in blk_get_readahead+a/60

From: James Simmons (jsimmons@transvirtual.com)
Date: Mon Apr 29 2002 - 17:23:44 EST

Next message: Alessandro Suardi: "2.5.11 breaks snd_printk if SND_VERBOSE_PRINTK = n"
Previous message: J.A. Magallon: "Re: Accurately measure CPU cycles used by a program? thanks"
In reply to: Miles Lane: "2.5.11 + framebuffer compile patch -- OOPS in blk_get_readahead+a/60"
Next in thread: Miles Lane: "Re: 2.5.11 + framebuffer compile patch -- OOPS in blk_get_readahead+a/60"
Reply: Miles Lane: "Re: 2.5.11 + framebuffer compile patch -- OOPS in blk_get_readahead+a/60"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> >>EIP; c01ee59a <blk_get_readahead+a/60> <=====
> Trace; c023a87c <device_size_calculation+ac/230>
> Trace; c023ab1f <do_md_run+11f/3d0>
> Trace; c02286eb <fbcon_cursor+9b/200>

That is strange. Which framebuffer driver are you using?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alessandro Suardi: "2.5.11 breaks snd_printk if SND_VERBOSE_PRINTK = n"
Previous message: J.A. Magallon: "Re: Accurately measure CPU cycles used by a program? thanks"
In reply to: Miles Lane: "2.5.11 + framebuffer compile patch -- OOPS in blk_get_readahead+a/60"
Next in thread: Miles Lane: "Re: 2.5.11 + framebuffer compile patch -- OOPS in blk_get_readahead+a/60"
Reply: Miles Lane: "Re: 2.5.11 + framebuffer compile patch -- OOPS in blk_get_readahead+a/60"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 30 2002 - 22:00:18 EST